Advertise with us! - Beyond HallyuBeyond Hallyu

Advertise with us!

We are a growing Korean culture website with a diverse audience.

We are UK-based and have a large percentage of UK readers as well as a large percentage of North American readers and a considerable number of South East Asian, Australian and other European readers.

Advertising and Sponsorship opportunities

Top banner display ad (728×90)

Top, middle and bottom sidebar display ad (368×280)

Sponsored events promotion

For more details about statistics and rates please get in touch with us at advertise@beyondhallyu.com.

- Beyond Hallyu giveaway: Win 1 of 3 K-pop bracelets of your choice!
  April 22, 2013
- I Love Korean Boys: The Problem of Fetishization
  June 03, 2013
- BH Discuss: Does CL's "MTBD" disrespect the Qur'an and Muslim K-pop fans?
  March 10, 2014
- It's all in your blood: Korean blood type superstitions
  May 31, 2013
- A suspected Korean cult is targeting K-pop fans in London and across Europe
  March 24, 2016
- You can watch the opening of the Korean Queer Culture Festival streamed live online
  June 09, 2015
- Oppa isn't really gay... How K-pop queer baiting leads to queer blindness
  October 08, 2017
- [Interview] Zandari Festa returns to Hongdae with another great lineup
  September 24, 2017
- SM makes idols like Samsung makes phones: K-pop as culture technology
  September 13, 2017
- DEAN is so popular in London they've put on a second date
  June 07, 2017
- HIGHLIGHT and EXID to play London Korean Festival in July
  June 07, 2017
- Is K-pop a genre? Yes. Yes it is.
  May 31, 2017
- Rambo says:
  Kim Eana I know the song Paradise Lost is not your work. I remember hearing it in the background of a movie scene. I don't think it ever appeared on an album so you welcome to use it. But you should be more truthful of its origins.
- Miss Bunny says:
  As if he was the only Korean man got DUI in the country's history ever. They could have a discussion to change the drinking policies in Korea instead of barking without bite.
- Guest says:
  Bye.
- Campanelle says:
  Goodbye.
- Guest says:
  She admitted to lying. That's why she was convicted of attempted fraud. Most of your comment has nothing to do with what I said. Facts are she lied and gave an interview knowing she was lying. That IS defamation so why was she cleared? Secondly, the edited pregnancy picture couldn't be verified if it was unedited or not, but it was mentioned it was suspicious. (An expert had said it looked she had taken the picture but the prosecutor was also able to replicate the same thing doing a screen shot using the exact same phone model.) As for the edited texts, 1) when submitting evidence you shouldn't be editing your evidence period. There's no justifiable reason to be spellchecking the texts. There's no reason for editing anything. She submits what she has end of story. As to thr irrelevant parts of your comment, why the hell would a criminal court suddenly take away custody in a country that's terrible at protecting children? There's literally a charity dedicated to kids whose parents get sent to prison and the kids end up forgotten and fending for themselves and unable to ask for help due to stigma.
- Campanelle says:
  I do not know if she admitted to lying or if because she had no proof it was considered a lie. And I do not know if she made a mistake on the forms with the dates. For me the pregnancy test pictures are all test results with one faint line and one dark line that are identical to women who have chemical pregnancies. It is not coincidence. The editing was found not to have altered the texts in her favor, so since it created no change of substance it was dismissed by the judge. If you write a post here, you can go back at a later date to edit it. I have done it many times, because I spot various mistakes typos, misspellings, missing words, comma faults. I correct them, which does not in any substantive way change the meaning of what I wrote. That is key in this. Did the editing change the texts to benefit her? The judge decided they did not. No mention is made in court that this woman has a history of illegal activity or shaking men down either. I read lots of comments that she was going down for evil ways. Yet, no history was presented. Finally, I read lots of comments about her being a “terrible mother” with no proof. I expected that to come out in the case as well. But it did not. In fact, it seems that the court thinks she is doing a great job and wants to help her stay with her child. Otherwise the court would have seized this as an opportunity to put her away.
Find Us On Facebook
Want to write for us?

Send us an article at submissions@beyondhallyu.com
Or click here to find out more..
Find us on Twitter

Tweets by @BeyondHallyu

Share this: